Dissenting View
Anal sex & AIDS
Fred Cline
Note: The information on this website is presented for
educational purposes and
is not a substitute for the advice of and treatment by a qualified professional.
This document was provided by
Continuum Magazine
VOL. 4 No. 5
Since early on in the AIDS "epidemic it has been widely asserted that there
is a correlation between gay men who practice passive anal sex and AIDS.1
The argument is that AIDS is induced by the direct immuno-suppressive action of semen
in the anus and by the deleterious effects of sexually-transmitted diseases (STDs) and
other infections more easily than through the mouth and throat (fellatio) or vagina.
This so-called scientific evidence is based on a correlation first made in the
Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1988.2 Correlation, however,
is not proof of causation.
Peter H Duesberg, on the other hand, in his paper "AIDS acquired by noncontagious
risk factors" states that: "The probable reason for the higher AIDS risk
associated with receptive anal intercourse is that this sexual practice directly
correlates with a two-fold enhanced use of nitrite inhalants and other aphrodisiac drugs
that facilitate anal intercourse."3 On numerous
occasions he has personally restated this position to me up to the present.
I am not able to argue the point that semen in the anus is directly immuno-suppressive
since I am not a scientist. Peter Duesberg, however, has pondered this and come to the
conclusion that even if it is mildly immuno-suppressive there is not sufficient quantity
to cause a general immune collapse such as we find in full-blown AIDS, even taking into
consideration those men who might practice passive anal sex compulsively.
It is generally assumed that anal sex is the riskiest form of sexual behavior for
passing on HIV. This may be so. Being an AIDS dissident, however, I believe that HIV
either is a harmless passenger virus of does not exist.4, 5
Leaving aside HIV, we are, therefore, only dealing with people who are ill for whatever
reason.
The evidence that I have for anal sex not directly leading to illness is based on
personal circumstantial evidence from an active gay life lived on three continents and
numerous textual references to widespread anal intercourse practiced around the world.
The most important reference I have been able to find for this practice amongst
heterosexuals is "Heterosexual anal intercourse" by Bruce Voeller.6 Some very
interesting facts emerge from this study. First of all let us look at the prevalence of
anal sex in the heterosexual population in the US. "According to the 1987 US census
figures, the American female population between ages 15 and 64 years is about 81.6
million. Based on the estimate that 10% of women engage with some frequency in anal
intercourse, roughly 8 million women are involved."7 He concludes that
"This startling number of women at risk through anal inter-course probably exceeds
the number of homosexual men at similar risk..."8 What
then accounts for the vast difference in the number of AIDS cases between the two groups?
Furthermore, "25 percent of teenage girls [in the US] engage in rectal
intercourse...to avoid pregnancy or to retain their virginity. But the risk for
...AIDS is the same as for females who do not practice anal intercourse
almost nonexistent."9
It is interesting to note that Kimberley Bergalis in the famous Dr David Acer case
was found to have venereal warts on the anus upon being autopsied.10
These can be contracted only by anal intercourse. This, in spite of the fact that she
testified before Congress that she was a virgin! Perhaps vaginally she was.
In many areas of the world anal sex is practiced as a means of birth control. It would
only seem logical that in China, a country of well over one billion individuals that
restricts its married couples to one child, this would be the case, especially since we
have abundant evidence in the poetry, literature and art of China of anal coupling.11 Furthermore, in this study the author contends that
"surviving literature [from China] depicts anal inter-course as the preferred form of
homosexual intercourse."12 China is still, in spite of the influence of
Communism, one of the most traditional and unchanging cultures on Earth. It is therefore
fairly certain that anal inter- is still widely practiced there, and in the light of their
huge population, the actual number of rear-end encounters could exceed those of the US. In
spite of this, we find practically no AIDS in China and China still suffers from a growing
population.
Even more starting are the statistics on heterosexual anal intercourse in Brazil.
"In a survey of some 5,000 households, over 40% of those interviewed in rural Brazil
considered anal intercourse a normal part of sexuality, and over 50% of urban citizens in
Rio de Janeiro did."13 The author further opines that
this is probably due to the widespread acceptance of this practice since prehistoric
times. One can only guess at what the total number of anal encounters might be in this
situation, since only those who admit to it are counted. Suffice it to say that it has
been almost universally practiced in Latin America from prehistoric times to the present.
There is a curious taboo against speaking of anal intercourse although, at this point,
I hope you are convinced that it is very widely practiced. This taboo has distorted any
objective treatment of the subject until recent times.
We should further note that in popular culture only gay men are thought of as
participants in back-door acrobatics. Recently, a famous actor was quoted as saying he did
not get along with gay men because they "took it up the ass." Although he
regretted this outburst, we can be grateful to him for highlighting this very important
misconception.
According to a recent survey done in the UK, the most frequent sex acts performed in
the gay population are as follows in descending order offrequency: (1) self-wank, (2)
wank/other, (3) suck, (4) fuck.14 The average of those who
"fuck" is set at around 6%.15 Similar studies have
revealed this pattern in the US and other developed countries. If, then, only 6% of the
gay population engage in anal sex on a regular basis, and, if, indeed, we only represent
10% of the population, it then becomes abundantly clear that most anal sex in almost all
societies is straight anal sex.
Straight men are not supposed to engage in receptive anal sex. My experience and
various other sources would tend also to lay this myth to rest. Need we remind ourselves
of what happens in all-male groups, such as prison or the armed forces? Steve Zeeland in
his book The masculine Marine: homoeroticism in the US Marine Corps documents, through
confidential interviews, that there is widespread anal sex amongst Marines who do not
consider themselves homosexuals.16 Marines, to a surprising
extent, he concludes, are notorious bottoms!
Lastly, I would like to quote Voeller again, who refers to a study of the Siwan of
Africa: "all men and boys engage in anal intercourse...and males are singled out as
peculiar [ie. queer? FC] if they do not indulge in these homosexual activities."17
Voeller also disabuses us of the canard that a tearing of the tissue in the rectum,
contributes to disease: "Fear about anal intercourse is bolstered by a widespread
viewpoint that it is accompanied by severe trauma to the rectal and anal walls, commonly
including bleeding. These notions find slim backing in fact, rape and force
excepted."18 With the abundance of new lubricants, this
should no longer even be considered a problem.
My conclusion is that semen deposited in the anus during intercourse does not
contribute to illness because this practice has been so widespread both geographically and
historically.
Although avoiding passive anal sex without a condom has become one of the cardinal
rules of "safe sex" in the gay world, I have come to doubt, because of the
aforementioned facts, the effectiveness of this practice in preventing "AIDS"
even though it obviously prevents the transmission of STDs. The myth has become so
widespread that one of the leading gay poets in an interview is quoted as saying: "I
do not practice unsafe sex, which to me is not practicing anal sex."19
In espousing this point of view I am therefore going against current prevailing
myths in the gay community.
Those gay men who have regular medical checkups for venereal disease, who do not use
hard drugs such as poppers and amphetamines, and who live a balanced life with some
attention paid to their health, should have no more problem with anal sex than their
heterosexual brothers and sisters who are apparently going at it in this manner with no
ill effects.
References
- Papadopulos-Eleopulos, E. Reappraisal of AIDS is the oxidation induced by the
risk factors the primary cause? Medical Hypotheses 25, 151-162. 1988; Root-Bernstein, R.
Rethinking AIDS. New York, etc. The Free Press, 1993; and others.
- See: Root-Bernstein, R. Rethinking AIDS. New York, etc. The Free Press, 1993, p 225.
- Duesberg, PH. AIDS acquired by drug consumption and other noncon- tagious risk factors.
Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol 55, pp 201-277, 1992, p 240.
- Duesberg PH. Inventing the AIDS virus, Washington DC, Regnery, 1996.
- Hodgkinson, N, AIDS: the failure of contemporary science. London, Fourth Estate, 1996.
- Voeller, B. Heterosexual anal intercourse in AIDS and Sex. New York, etc. Oxford
University Press, 1990, pp 276-310 (The Kinsey Institute series, vol IV).
- Ibid., p 296.
- Ibid., p 296.
- Brown, T. Black lies, white lies. New York, William Morrow, 1996, p 171.
- Ibid., p 171-172.
- Hinsch, B. Passions of the cut sleeve. Berkeley, etc. University of California Press,
1990.
- Ibid., p 8.
- Voeller, op. cit., p 283.
- Coxon, APM. Between the sheets. London, Cassell, 1996. p 78.
- Ibid., p 78.
- Zeeland, S. The masculine Marine: homoeroticism in the US Marine Corps. New York,
Harrington Press, 1996.
- Voeller, op. cit., p 299.
- Voeller, op. cit., p 279.
- Lewis, A. Poet Thom Gunn shoots off his mouth. San Francisco Frontiers Magazine, vol.
15, issue 14, Nov. 7, 1996. p 20.
Click here for More About CONTINUUM |