|
A Clinical Study:
POSITIVE RESULTS ACHIEVED
IN 150 FIBROMYALGIA PATIENTS!
Abstract from The Journal of Integrative
Medicine Volume 3 Number 1
Majid Ali, M.D., Judy Juco, M.D., Alfred O. Fayemi, M.D., Omar
Ali, M.D., Mahboob Baig, M.B.,B.S.;
Marta Babol, M.D., Karimullah Zirvi, Ph.D., Carol
Grieder-Bradenberger, R.N., Mary Ann Carroll, R.N.
This article was provided by:
Aging Healthfully Magazine
Note:
The information on this website is presented for educational purposes
only.
It is not a substitute for the advice of a qualified
professional.
The data in
this clinical outcome study document the efficacy of the
ecologic-integrative management protocols used in
reversing fibromyalgia
(excellent or good outcome in 84.7%).
EFFICACY
OF ECOLOGIC-INTEGRATIVE MANAGEMENT
PROTOCOLS FOR REVERSAL OF FIBROMYALGIA:
An Open Prospective Study of 150 Patients
Objective
To report the results of an open,
prospective trial of broad-based, ecologic-integrative
management protocols for the reversal of fibromyalgia in 150
patients.
Patients
One hundred fifty patients who presented at
the Institute of Integrative Medicine with fibromyalgia and
for whom clinical outcome data were available for at least six
months prior were included in this study. There were 116
females (range of age, 13-81 yrs) and 34 males (range of age,
14-68 yrs). The average duration of illness was 6.6 years and
the average duration of clinical management was 11.5 months.
Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1, when the
duration of illness was less than three years; Group 2, when
the duration of illness was between three and six years; and
Group 3, when the duration of illness was longer than six
years.
Ecologic-Integrative Management Protocols
The comprehensive, ecologic-integrative
management protocols employed were based on clinical,
biochemical, and high-resolution microscopic assessment of the
microecologic cellular and macroecologic tissue-organ systems
of the body. Such protocols included the following: choices in
the kitchen designed to provide for optimal hydration,
elimination of foods causing incompatibility reactions and
rapid glucose-insulin-adrenaline shifts; supplementation with
vitamins, minerals, and some "redox-restorative
substances" (RRSs) such as glutathione, taurine,
methylsulfonylmethane (MSM), coenzyme Q10, and lipoic acid;
ample herbal support for the bowel, blood, and liver
ecosystems (including colon hydrotherapy and liver flushes);
endocrine support, especially for the thyroid, adrenals, and
sex hormones; intramuscular and intravenous nutrient
protocols; oxygenative therapies, including nasal oxygen,
intravenous infusions of hydrogen peroxide and ozone, and EDTA
chelation; gentle stretching and noncompetitive (limbic)
exercise; and training in effective methods for self-
regulation, stress reduction, and guidance for spiritual
surrender.
Assessment of Compliance
Assessment of compliance was based on
entries made on a specifically designed clinical outcome sheet
during follow-up visits. The following scale of scores was
used for assessment of compliance according to predetermined
criteria: Class A, a compliance value greater than 75%; Class
B, a value between 75% and 50 %; Class C, a value between 50%
and 25%; and Class D, a value lower than 25%.
Assessment of Clinical Outcome
Assessment of clinical outcome was based on
concurrent evaluation of the progress made, or lack thereof,
employing the clinical outcome sheet. The scale of scores for
clinical improvement comprised the following: excellent
outcome (Category I) when more than 90% relief of symptoms was
obtained and all drug therapies were discontinued; good
outcome (Category II) when the relief of symptoms was between
90% and 75%, with a similar reduction in use of drugs; fair
outcome (Category III) when the relief of symptoms was between
75% and 50% with a similar reduction in symptoms; and poor
outcome (Category IV) when the relief of symptoms was less
than 50% with a similar reduction in the use of drugs.
Results
The overall final outcome scores for all
150 patients were as follows: excellent outcome, 65.4%; good,
19.3%; fair, 5.3%; and poor, 10%. The final outcome scores for
Group 1 (56) patients were as follows: excellent outcome, 75%;
good, 10.7%; fair, 7.2%; and poor, 7.1%. The final outcome
scores for Group 2 patients (26) were as follows: excellent
outcome, 69.2%; good, 19.2%; fair, 7.7%; and poor, 3.9%. The
final outcome scores for Group 3 patients (68) were as
follows: excellent outcome, 55.9%; good, 26.5%; fair, 2.9 %;
and poor, 14.7%.
Conclusion
The data in this clinical outcome study
document the efficacy of the ecologic-integrative management
protocols used in reversing fibromyalgia (excellent or good
outcome in 84.7%). The results provide empirical support for
the view that fibromyalgia is an oxidative-dysoxygenative
disorder (ODD) and that disruptions of the bowel, blood, and
liver ecosystems play critical roles in its pathogenesis. The
data also warrant further and larger clinical outcome studies
of the efficacy of the ecologic-integrative protocols such as
those employed in this study for reversing fibromyalgia, a
disorder for which no pharmacologic regimens have yielded
satisfactory results so far. |
Comments?
E-mail Dr.Ali
Click
here to visit the Aging Healthfully Website
Copyright İMajid Ali İAging Healthfully, Inc.
|